↓ Skip to main content

Taylor and Francis Online

Article Metrics

Evidence of suboscine song plasticity in response to traffic noise fluctuations and temporary road closures

Overview of attention for article published in Bioacoustics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 220)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of suboscine song plasticity in response to traffic noise fluctuations and temporary road closures
Published in
Bioacoustics, April 2017
DOI 10.1080/09524622.2017.1303645
Authors

Katherine E. Gentry, Megan F. McKenna, David A. Luther

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 44%
Environmental Science 12 17%
Computer Science 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 21 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#275,007
of 19,151,080 outputs
Outputs from Bioacoustics
#3
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,656
of 279,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioacoustics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,151,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.